Analisis Kepenulisan Surat 1 Petrus: Suatu Tanggapan Terhadap Teori Pseudonymous
Abstract
The pseudonymous theory in the authorship of 1 Peter is a threat to the authority of 1 Peter. This article aims to respond to the pseudonymous theory. Although it does not represent the view of the evangelical interpreter as a whole, this article attempts to maintain the authority of 1 Peter as an integral part of the Bible. The author presents internal and external evidences that supports the theory that Peter wrote the letter. The author analyzes the material, the writing’s purposes, literature and outline to show internal evidence. The author also presents the ancient documents which have recorded Peter as the author of 1 Peter. The belief in the authority of 1 Peter is to encourage believers to respect every passage in the Bible as the spiritual mind of God. Thus, believers have a solid foundation in thinking, speaking and acting according to God's Word.
References
Alexander, David, and Pat Alexander. Eerdmans Handbook to The Bible. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982.
Blum, Edwin A. “1 Peter.” In Zondervan NIV Bible Commentary, edited by R Kohlenberg. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994.
Carson, D A. Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 2007.
Carson, D A., and Douglas J. Moo. An Introduction to the New Testament. Second Edi. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009.
Chester, Andrew, and Ralph P. Martin. The Theology of The Letters of James, Peter, and Jude. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Clowney, Edmund. “The Massage of 1 Peter: The Way of the Cross.” In The Bible Speaks Today, edited by John Stott. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 1988.
Craddock, Fred B. First And Second Peter and Jude. Louisville: John Knox Press, 1995.
Eep, Eldon Jay., and D. Fee, Gordon. Studies In The Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Critisism. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2000.
Evans, Craig A. Ancient Text for New Testament Studies: A Guide to the Backgroud Literatur. Peabody: Hendrickson Publisher, 2005.
Grundem, Wayne. “1 Peter.” In Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. Liecester: InterVarsity, 1999.
Horrell, David G. “The Product of a Petrine Circle? A Reassessment of the Origin and Character of 1 Peter.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 24, no. 4 (June 21, 2002): 29–60. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0142064X0202400402.
Jobes, Karen H. “1 Peter.” In Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, edited by Robert B. Yarbrough and Robert H. Stein. Grand Rapids, 2005.
Klein, William W., Craig L. Blomberg, and Robert L. Hubbard. Introduction to Biblical Interpretation: Pengantar Tafsiran Alkitab. Edited by Chiliana Jusuf and Danny A. Gamadi. 2nd ed. Malang: SAAT, 2016.
Richard, Randolph E. “Silvanus Was Not Peter’s Secretary: Theological Bias In Interpreting ‘Dia Silvanou..Egrapsa’ In Peter 5:12.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 43 (2000): 417–432.
Wettscot, B.F. General Survey of The History of the Canon New Testament. London: Macmillan, 1896.
Yusuf, Muri. Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Predica Verbum: Jurnal Teologi dan Misi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
